Claim intake workflow improvements
Overview
My role & goal
As the Senior UX Designer, I led the design of the claim intake process within a claims-processing platform used by intake clerks and adjudicators. The previous workflow was highly manual—claims arrived by mail or email and adjudicators had to enter them manually into the system themselves.
The goal was to deliver a streamlined and scalable intake experience that reduced manual effort while better supporting clerks in preparing claims and adjudicators in completing reviews.
The team
Senior UX Designer
Project Managers
Business Analyst
Clients
Developers
Quality assurance
Understanding the problem
User group: Claim intake clerks, claim adjudicators
Methods: Discovery workshops
I led the full end-to-end research and discovery process:
Stakeholder and client interviews to understand the existing manual workflows.
Journey mapping workshops with claim intake clerks and adjudicators to visualize pain points and inefficiencies.
Problem statement discovery based on the mapped journey.
Validation sessions to confirm that the identified problems matched real operational challenges.
This collaborative discovery phase ensured alignment early and created shared understanding across teams.
Defining key design goals
From the research and journey mapping exercises, we established the following goals:
Reduce manual data entry for adjudicators.
Centralize and organize incoming claims (mail, scan, email) into a unified workflow.
Enable intake clerks to quickly upload, prepare and categorize claims.
Improve traceability and reduce errors before claims reach adjudicators.
Provide a scalable and efficient foundation for future claims automation.
These goals helped frame the “How Might We” questions to guide the brainstorming sessions with clients and internal teams.
Ideation & exploration
I explored multiple ways to streamline intake workflows before committing to a direction:
Created early concepts and wireframes depicting multiple intake flow options.
Collaborated with clients to refine flows and gather operational feedback.
Built iterative wireframes showcasing different import paths (scan, email, batch upload).
Facilitated brainstorming sessions using the problem statements and “How Might We” to generate solutions.
This collaborative exploration helped validate the best direction before moving into detailed design.
Iterative design
Method: User testing and feedback sessions with the clients and our team stakeholders
Approach: Show → Discuss → Collect feedback → Refine
Once a direction was established, I created a mid-fidelity prototype to test and validate:
Claim upload and import process
Metadata entry and required fields
Sorting, grouping and preparing claims
Error handling, statuses and progress indicators
Usability and workflow efficiency
Feedback from clerks and adjudicators helped refine detailed functionality and interactions before moving to high fidelity.
Final design solution
I delivered polished, developer-ready designs for all key flows, including
✓ Centralized inbox for scanned and emailed claims in a new claim intake section
✓ Batch import tools to quickly upload multiple documents
✓ Claim preparation workflows allowing clerks to categorize, verify and prepare files
✓ Clear statuses and indicators for in-progress, ready-for-review and flagged claims
✓ Seamless handoff to adjudicators, reducing manual data entry and improving throughput
This solution significantly reduced the adjudicators' workload and standardized the intake process across teams.
Outcome
Although no formal metrics were collected, adjudicators reported meaningful time savings and expressed strong appreciation for the streamlined intake workflow.
Reflection
This project reinforced how impactful thorough discovery can be. I really enjoyed leading the end-to-end research workshops, it allowed us to understand users deeply and design a solution that made a meaningful difference in their day-to-day work.